Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > As part of recent hacking moving towards 2.0 i have been working on a > new data directory for 2.x better suited to our configuration. Here is > the proposal. Feedback welcome. > > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+34+-+New+data+directory+structure+for+2.x > > -Justin I thought we were going to cover up the distinction between coverage store and data store ? If so, I think we should do the same in directory structure and use subclassing as needed.
How are modules / plugins expected to add to this configuration ? New files in the directories, or do we provide some hooks to put it straight into the XML files? If we do the latter, then core modules should use these hooks too to ensure that they're actually usable and maintained. -Arne -- Arne Kepp OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
