Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]> escribió:
>>> As far as I know the one geoserver assumption/convention has always been
>>> the feature type name matches the element (as Ben stated).
>> IMHO it is not an assumption nor a convention, but a HACK.
> Call it what you will but the HACK works just fine for the 95% case, or 
> any format that is not GML.

This only looks like a 5% case from the GeoServer point of view because 
very few people using application schemas use GeoServer, because 
application schemas are not well supported. This is a chicken and egg 
problem.

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining
Australian Resources Research Centre
26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to