It would make sense to me to have it constrained to one place. That said I am not a feature or map service provider, so perhaps there is a use for this per service. Perhaps a poll of the users list might be in order.
Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I was looking into the service panels and service > info objects, and noticed how the ServiceInfo > class has a "maintainer" and "onlineResource" > fields that seem to be used by WFS 1.0 > and WMS 1.1 (online resource at least). > > In more recent documents the two items > above seem to have been replaced by "Provider" > and "Provider site". > > What I'm wondering is, should we really have this > kind of information available for all services? > Wouldn't it be better to centralize it just > like ContactInfo is? > > Cheers > Andrea > > > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
