Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Well technically LayerInfo does not have any of these attributes either. > They all come from ResourceInfo, which is broken in terms of a > resource-publishing split. > > As for LayerGroupInfo it seems that this would indicate that it and > LayerInfo should share come common super interface... I wonder if it > makes sense to push all metadata type stuff into a LayerMedatadaInfo > interface. And both LayerInfo and LayerGroupInfo could implement it. > > As for the issue with the current ResourceInfo... how would people feel > about deprecating those methods and moving them to LayerInfo?
I would be ok but there is one catch: WFS and WCS reference resources directly, so we'd loose the ability to build complete capabilities documents. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
