I think this looks like a good improvement. The wrapping to multiple lines for long titles isn't something I find overly jarring, personally - and could be an impetus for folks to use shorter titles, which it sounds like we want to steer people towards as a best- practice anyway.
Chris On Apr 8, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > so I tried to factor in all the feedback I got so far: > - icons > - workspace and name united > - showing title > - better looking names for the format dropdown (this > does not really work, we have to redefine something > in the output format API, more on this in a separate mail). > - filtering using abstract and keywords as well > > The result is in the screenshots attached. It does not > look too good in the case the user specified a really > long layer name (there are no limits on it). > > Any more feedback? > > Cheers > Andrea > > -- > Andrea Aime > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. > < > previewUpdated2 > .jpg > > > < > previewUpdated3 > .jpg > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. > Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com_______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
