i would be into that. just so you know, its hard for me to make hard and fast recommendations for geoserver, as i'm still determining how people use it. (as i said to mike yesterday, what's the heart of geoserver? or something like that.) so these suggestions are coming from a beginner's perspective. which had value in and of itself, of course. but is obviously not the only--or even most important--consideration.
hope everyone is well, alyssa. Andrea Aime wrote: > alyssa wright ha scritto: >> for me the rational in hiding them, is not about overwhelm. rather, >> its about the hierarchy of options. the current hierarchy doesn't >> sync with how i use geoserver. for me, data is the most active part >> of my geoserver time, yet its all the way on the bottom. server >> details are not things im going to change, yet its all the way on the >> top. this may not be what people use geoserver for--data work--but >> its how i use geoserver. > > You have a point there. But we could solve it by reordering the menu > and putting data near the top. > > Cheers > Andrea > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
