Yes agreed. That what I meant to imply (at least in one point). Apologies for any lack of clarity.
Hope everyone is well, Alyssa. Mike Pumphrey wrote: > I think a way around this is to move the textual link that says > "Remove selected ___" to be a button right below (or above) the > checkbox column with a simple "Remove". Right now the << < 1 > >> is > in between so the eye (well, my eye) doesn't travel to the Remove area. > > I'm actually fine with the "Add new ____" being on top of the << < 1 > > >>, though, since it's not directly related to the list of existing > things. > > > > Thanks, > Mike Pumphrey > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > > > Andrea Aime wrote: >> alyssa wright ha scritto: >>> i see your point. . but i still think there's a disconnect between >>> selecting multiple workspaces and knowing what actions are available >>> once selected. i'm not sure how it could best be resolved. but, >>> maybe we need to make the delete buttons closer to the table? if >>> we're modeling after google, they have the scroll through pages at >>> the same level as the delete option, not below. >> >> This has been iterated over quite some times already, so I'm not >> sure how to improve it. It just works fine for me. >> I'll leave the decision to the design/interaction people. >> >> Cheers >> Andrea >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Geoserver-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
