Andrea Aime wrote: > Chris Holmes ha scritto: >> How can rest config be a blocker? It's an extension, not even shipped >> with GeoServer. It can be updated on its own. [...] >> I concede we should do an rc2. And some other issues will likely come >> up. But it seems weird to me something that an optional extension >> should be a blocker. > > I did not create the issue, Ben did. Since it's an easy fix I did not > care to tone down the priority.
Chris, it is my practice to report all build failures as blockers (= stops development) as a first step, for everything included in a release build. restconfig is included in -PallExtensions and -Prelease. Allowing failures to persist results in developers skipping tests. In this case, it is a little harsh as the failure is on Windows only, but I think we should start treating Windows as a first-class build platform. Andrea has already got almost everything building in the win32 Hudson, and aiming for a clean win32 build makes the most of this work. I was hoping to aim high. :-) I am happy for the team to reclassify any build failure after giving it due consideration. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Australian Resources Research Centre 26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
