Okay, sure. Nitpicky question: Do we have the actual link on the downloads page point to an online doc, or do we have a zip file containing just a README?
Thanks, Mike Pumphrey OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Andrea Aime wrote: > Mike Pumphrey ha scritto: >> Hey Andrea. Personally, I would be fine with all of our extensions >> shipped as part of core, so I'm not complaining! :) >> >> But if GDAL jars are bundled with core, then we don't really need a >> GDAL extension, do we? I would say that we should not have a "blank" >> (no jar) extension, but just have better docs (which I am writing >> now)... > > Yes and no. People need to know that in order to have GDAL supported > formats available they need to install some extras. > We don't list PostGIS among the datastore extensions because > it's core, you look into the "new datastore" list and find it. > But if we remove the GDAL link people might start to get confused, > it's not there in the "new coverage" list, it's not among the > downloads.. uuuh... has it been dropped? Is it not working? > > An acceptable compromise is keep the link in the downloads, > but turn it into a link to the docs one needs to read in order > to complete the GDAL installation instead. > > Cheers > Andrea > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
