Simone Giannecchini ha scritto: > Hi list, > I was playing around today with geoserver trunk code and I noticed > that coverages with dot as part of the name do not work anymore due to > the new config/ui work. > This should be seen as a regression since it is quite frequent to have > raster data generated with dots as part of the name. > Should I opne upa Jira?
I guess so. I know we have had issues with feature type names with dots as well, as they are common type names in SDE land, but they are not valid in WFS 1.1 (not sure about WFS 1.0). The current code in BasicResourceConfig adds a pattern validator like: [\\w_]\\w* (either a word char or a underscore and then only word chars). First off it would be nice to have a list of the valid patterns for the various services, and then we have to decide if being lax and allow invalid chars in the name for some services or not (e.g. say the dot is valid for wfs 1.0 but on wfs 1.1, what do we do?) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
