I don't think we have ever been 100% consistent about this. But in general on the stable branch we have included the patch number in snapshot version numbers.
I know others have stated that this looks odd as well. I do find it kind of useful to be able to tell what release stream a snapshot comes from, but it makes it a pain for projects depending on geoserver. Should we propose a change? Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > I just noticed that the pom gs.version on 2.0.x is set to > > 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT > > Is this intended? I though that the head of this branch would remain as > > 2.0-SNAPSHOT > > Or did I miss something? > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
