Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Well admittedly I don't have an understanding of the changes so maybe a > proposal is pushing it. It was just the way it was described it made it > seem like the changes were significant. And there was also the > implication that since KML was not under active development lately that > things could go ahead with no objection.
What I meant was, the change should not be big, and since there has not been much KML interest lately I may be wasting people time, but since it's new functionality I wanted to tell everybody what I was doing anyways. > Anyways like I said, just my 2c as I don't have the same understanding > of the changes. If you say the changes do not warrant a proposal then > that is good enough for me :) I don't think it is, but developing it might prove me wrong. What about you review the patch once it's ready, so we can both look into it and see if it's GSIP worthy? In the meantime, any comment, from anyone, on the actual functionality introduced? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
