Andrea Aime wrote: > Arne Kepp ha scritto: >> All the images are 32x32, since that's what GE expects. The syntax I >> used was <shape>/fillrgb_outlinergb_diameter.format > > They have to be 32x32? What happens if they are not? > Looking into the reference: > http://code.google.com/intl/it-IT/apis/kml/documentation/kmlreference.html#icon > > > I don't see any mention of the size, though I noticed > that rectangular icons are displayed smaller than I though > > Cheers > Andrea They used to have width and height parameters for <Icon>, but then they deprecated those in 2.1 because they were not being respected by Google Earth anyways, things were rendered as 32x32 by default.
But if you set <scale> to more than 1.0, then a larger image does look better, so I guess I should say that you should probably not make images smaller than 32x32, but larger can be a good idea. -Arne ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
