> Qcuik questions:
> - are you adding a reprojection in the mix while you are doing this tests?

I have tried it both with and without reprojection, to the same effect.

> - are all your granules of the same resolution?

Yes, they are all 0.15m pixels in 5000x4000 images.  I have tried both
leaving the existing 0 level images at 5000x4000 (-pyramidOnly) and retiling
to 2048x2048, both with the same result.

Steve


On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Stephen Mather
<s...@clevelandmetroparks.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrea,
>      I've been working on giving it a spin with our own data.  The 
> tutorial is excellent.  Easy to read and follow.
>      I'm currently testing it on a Windows 2003 server with nightly 
> build geoserver-2.0.x-2010-03-03-bin.zip, and 
> geoserver-2.0.2-SNAPSHOT-pyramid-plugin.zip
>      The test I've been doing is with 0.5ft (0.15m) color orthophotos 
> that sum to about 150GB as TIFFs.  They are currently tiled as 
> 5000x4000 images. I've retiled them with gdal_retile as 2048x2048 
> images with overviews with the following command:
>
> gdal_retile -v -s_srs "EPSG:102722" -levels 5 -ps 2048 2048 -targetdir 
> test3 --optfile tilelist.txt
>
> I'm currently working on a subset of the data for testing. Checking 
> all the tiles generated from gdal_retile, they all look fine in an 
> image viewer, and check out  (with a spot check) with gdalinfo.
>
> When I load them in GeoServer, I get a strange effect.  Some of the 
> tiles never render at their full resolution for a given zoom level, 
> but at a reduced resolution.  If I load ~16 tiles vs. loading e.g. 40+ 
> tiles the places where this happens shifts, i.e. tiles that were a 
> problem before stop being a problem, while other tiles exhibit the 
> same behavior.
>
> Does this make sense, is this an effect you've seen, and would images 
> and log files be helpful?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
>
>
> Andrea Aime-4 wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> lately I've been working, under OpenGeo request, to improve the 
>> situation vs image pyramids, in particular, making it easier to 
>> configure a file based one.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Is anyone interested to give the tutorial a spin, a review? Is there 
>> anything missing or that could be done better?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>> --
>> Andrea Aime
>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>> Expert service straight from the developers.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
>
http://old.nabble.com/Image-pyramid-improvements-and-tutorial-tp27608654p279
10740.html
> Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to