My GeoServer 2.0.2 is pegged to 2.6.4 so I don't think there is a need for retagging?
My knowledge in the release cycle is limited though hahah :) Jody Garnett-3 wrote: > > Question do I need to retag GeoTools 2.6.4 I have not package or announced > yet. > Jody > > On 18/05/2010, at 6:35 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > >> Rini has fixed the problem that was causing the CITE failures >> (GEOS-3969), and is sure it was caused by the change committed in 11 >> December (GEOS-3553). So we are wondering about GeoServer 2.0.1. >> >> On 18/05/10 15:30, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >>> Mark, >>> >>> was CITE WFS 1.1.0 testing performed for the GeoServer 2.0.1 release? We >>> are trying to diagnose a failure and the suspect change went into 2.0.x >>> on 11 December, so should also have broken 2.0.1. >>> >>> Did your CITE WFS 1.1.0 tests pass? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >> >> >> -- >> Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> >> Software Engineering Team Leader >> CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering >> Australian Resources Research Centre >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Geoserver-devel mailing list >> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/CITE-testing-for-GeoServer-2.0.1-tp28592526p28603567.html Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
