the last run cite test for wfs1.1 returned successful but I see failures in the log.
Justin Deoliveira-6 wrote: > > Quick update on automated cite tests. I have the tests running on the > build server and have set up a couple of jobs in hudson to run the tests: > > http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/view/cite/ > > Only wfs 1.0 and wfs 1.1 are set up so far. As you can see wfs 1.0 is > good to go but wfs 1.1 has some failures (did not investigate the cause). > > It's far from complete but at this point a proof of concept that it can > work. Among the things to do that come to mind: > > * come up with a better way to display the logs > * make scripts for starting and stopping geoserver more robust > * document the setup > * submit the patches back into teamengine > * set up remaining test suites > * move to a separate server ** > > ** Not sure about this one. That build server is pretty overloaded as it > is with all the other build jobs so i am not sure how much running the > cite jobs will tax the server. I guess we can see how it goes. > > -Justin > > -- > Justin Deoliveira > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Enterprise support for open source geospatial. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/automated-cite-testing-tp28590879p28603578.html Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
