As I recall you made a proposal earlier; and we decided to let the functionality hang out for a while we got feedback (and confidence) from people using it in the field. Sounds like that has occurred? +1
Jody On 03/06/2010, at 11:23 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I would like to propose we move the control-flow extension to > extensions in both 2.0.x and trunk. > > Rationale: > - I have been using it for 4 months on demo.opengeo.org/geoserver > with good success, the box has been quite stable so far and without > performance issues > - it is documented: > http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/community/controlflow/index.html > - has a maintaner (me) > > PSC, what do you think? Btw, shall I do a formal proposal or a mail is > enough? ;-) > > Cheers > PSAndrea > > -- > Andrea Aime > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
