On 16/08/10 22:12, Gabriel Roldan wrote:
> Luca, wouldn't geoserver-devel be more an appropriate place where to discuss
> Terracott-ing GeoServer?
As you like, but the issue lies in the way GeoTools handles objects, hence the
thread's name.
>> I'm all for making the Catalog objects cluster friendly. In fact it seems it
>> was initially the idea? the base interface Info implements Serializable.
>>
>> So, is this just a problem with serializing CoordinateReferenceSystem
>> implementations?
No. The problem is in the way weak references are hold in containers; while I
understand the rational behind it (to GC objects even when they are still hold
in
a container), this way is incompatible with an external cache.
Using strong references would make Terracotta happy, but would probably mean
memory leaks and bloated heaps for the rest of implementations... this has to
be
designed carefully.
Regards,
--------------------
Luca Morandini
www.lucamorandini.it
--------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
