The commits for GSIP 49 went through svn and the wms module looks healthier than ever (if you're subscribed to the geoserver-commits mailing list you surely noticed already).
Thanks to all of you that provided feedback, votes and review time. Gabriel On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 14:31 -0300, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > Thanks everyone for the quick turn around on this proposal. > > I'm planning on committing this to trunk later today when most of you > should be out of office hours, so that I can make sure nothing breaks > meanwhile. > > If there's any impediment to do so that you can think of please speak > asap. > > Thanks again, > Gabriel > > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 12:05 +1000, Jody Garnett wrote: > > Thanks Gabriel; and thanks to those who reviewed at the code sprint. > > Added my vote to the wiki page. > > Jody > > On 19/09/2010, at 11:28 AM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > > > > Hello again, > > > > > > all the concerns in the proposal have been addressed, including CITE > > > testing, and hence I would like to call for review and voting as > > > appropriate. > > > > > > Already updated the page with the votes given in the mailing list. > > > Here's the proposal page again: <http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP > > > +49+-+WMS+module+cleanup+and+refactoring> > > > > > > I would specially like to hear from Simone/Alessio as they might be > > > doing some WMS related development so this would be the time to raise > > > any further concern. > > > > > > Waiting for your feedback, > > > > > > Gabriel. > > > > > > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 19:56 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > > >> On 16/09/2010 00:57, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> I have been working on the long awaited WMS module clean up in an effort > > >>> to finally port it to the Dispatcher architecture, and during the FOSS4G > > >>> code sprint we (Andrea, Justin and myself) have been through a code > > >>> review. > > >>> > > >>> Here's the proposal:<http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+49+-+WMS > > >>> +module+cleanup+and+refactoring> > > >>> > > >>> And here where the work is taking place: > > >>> <http://github.com/groldan/geoserver_trunk/tree/wmscleanup> > > >>> > > >>> Please feel free to comment out on any issue/concern you might find with > > >>> it. The pending issues we identified during the code review are already > > >>> listed on the proposal. I would like to commit to trunk once all those > > >>> concerns are taken care of. > > >> > > >> Yup, very much looking forward to this one :-) > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> Cheers > > >> Andrea > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > Gabriel Roldan > > > [email protected] > > > Expert service straight from the developers > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > > > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > > > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Geoserver-devel mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > > -- Gabriel Roldan [email protected] Expert service straight from the developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
