Andrea, could you send a link to the issue, that I can have a look at.
Is it a patch for geotools or for geserver? Probably I can check the data
(shapefiles) but I am really confused about the successfull filtering with
each filter standalone but in combination it fails. I could test to query
only the text filter and process the features with a local spatial filter.
Could be a workaround but if the first filter has condition that returns
many many features the performance would be bad.
Frank
2010/10/4 Andrea Aime <[email protected]>
> I've seen that kind of error happen when the filter functions get a
> null value... sometimes
> it's really the data itself that's null, and the filter functions do
> not care for it.
> David provided a patch for it on the GeoServer jira but I still
> haven't had the time
> to apply it. There is only one thing that bugs me a little about the
> patch, in some
> functions you insert a null and get back an empty string, imho it should
> return
> null again instead
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Frank,
> > Strange... I can't think why the combination fo the filters would fail.
> The
> > stack trace indicates that the failure is occuring due to one of the
> > operands to the islike function being null. The literal should be no
> problem
> > because internally it is converted to a string and any value can be
> > converted to a string. So my guess would be the PropertyName. Are you
> sure
> > "NAME" is the correct attribute name including case?
> > When i get a minute I will see if i can replicate the issue with another
> > dataset.
> > -Justin
> > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Frank Gasdorf <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Justin,
> >>
> >> the last two days I tried to get the combination of isLike and BBOX
> filter
> >> running but with the configuration described before (geoserver 2.0.2 and
> >> udig 1.2) it failed always with an NPE:
> >>
> >> at
> >>
> org.geotools.filter.function.StaticGeometry.isLike(StaticGeometry.java:644)
> >> at
> >>
> org.geotools.filter.function.FilterFunction_isLike.evaluate(FilterFunction_isLike.java:61)
> >> at
> org.geotools.filter.FilterAbstract.eval(FilterAbstract.java:96)
> >> at
> >> org.geotools.filter.IsEqualsToImpl.evaluate(IsEqualsToImpl.java:52)
> >> at org.geotools.filter.AndImpl.evaluate(AndImpl.java:55)
> >> at
> >>
> org.geotools.data.FilteringFeatureReader.hasNext(FilteringFeatureReader.java:130)
> >> at
> >> org.geotools.data.MaxFeatureReader.hasNext(MaxFeatureReader.java:84)
> >> at
> >> org.geotools.data.MaxFeatureReader.hasNext(MaxFeatureReader.java:84)
> >> at
> >>
> org.geotools.data.DefaultFeatureResults.getCount(DefaultFeatureResults.java:329)
> >> at
> >>
> org.geotools.data.store.DataFeatureCollection.size(DataFeatureCollection.java:265)
> >> at
> >>
> org.geotools.feature.collection.DecoratingFeatureCollection.size(DecoratingFeatureCollection.java:168)
> >> at
> >>
> org.geotools.data.crs.ReprojectFeatureResults.size(ReprojectFeatureResults.java:120)
> >> at org.geoserver.wfs.GetFeature.run(GetFeature.java:371)
> >> at
> >>
> org.geoserver.wfs.DefaultWebFeatureService.getFeature(DefaultWebFeatureService.java:115)
> >> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >> at
> >>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> >> at
> >>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> >> at
> >>
> org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:310)
> >> at
> >>
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:182)
> >> at
> >>
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:149)
> >> at org.geoserver.ows.util.EMFLogger.invoke(EMFLogger.java:51)
> >> at
> >>
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
> >> at
> >>
> org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
> >> at $Proxy19.getFeature(Unknown Source)
> >> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >> at
> >>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> >> at
> >>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> >> at org.geoserver.ows.Dispatcher.execute(Dispatcher.java:599)
> >> at
> >> org.geoserver.ows.Dispatcher.handleRequestInternal(Dispatcher.java:230)
> >> at
> >>
> org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.AbstractController.handleRequest(AbstractController.java:153)
> >> at
> >>
> org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.SimpleControllerHandlerAdapter.handle(SimpleControllerHandlerAdapter.java:48)
> >> at
> >>
> org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doDispatch(DispatcherServlet.java:875)
> >> at
> >>
> org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doService(DispatcherServlet.java:809)
> >> at
> >>
> org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.processRequest(FrameworkServlet.java:571)
> >> at
> >>
> org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.doPost(FrameworkServlet.java:511)
> >> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637)
> >> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
> >> at
> >>
> org.vfny.geoserver.filters.SetCharacterEncodingFilter.doFilter(SetCharacterEncodingFilter.java:108)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
> >> at
> >>
> org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:265)
> >> at
> >>
> org.acegisecurity.intercept.web.FilterSecurityInterceptor.invoke(FilterSecurityInterceptor.java:107)
> >> at
> >>
> org.acegisecurity.intercept.web.FilterSecurityInterceptor.doFilter(FilterSecurityInterceptor.java:72)
> >> at
> >>
> org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:275)
> >>
> >> The getFeature Request looks like that:
> >>
> >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >> <wfs:GetFeature handle="GeoTools 2.6-3 WFS DataStore"
> >> outputFormat="text/xml; subtype=gml/3.1.1" resultType="results"
> >> service="WFS" version="1.1.0" xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc";
> >> xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml";
> >> xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
> >> xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows";
> >> xmlns:wfs="http://www.opengis.net/wfs";>
> >> <wfs:Query typeName="naturalEarth:ne-10m-populated-places">
> >> <ogc:Filter>
> >> <ogc:And>
> >> <ogc:PropertyIsEqualTo matchCase="true">
> >> <ogc:Literal>true</ogc:Literal>
> >> <ogc:Function name="isLike">
> >> <ogc:PropertyName>NAME</ogc:PropertyName>
> >> <ogc:Literal>(?i)Hamburg(.)*</ogc:Literal>
> >> </ogc:Function>
> >> </ogc:PropertyIsEqualTo>
> >> <ogc:BBOX>
> >> <ogc:PropertyName>the_geom</ogc:PropertyName>
> >> <gml:Envelope>
> >> <gml:lowerCorner>-8.12030075187971
> >> 38.584213720391205</gml:lowerCorner>
> >> <gml:upperCorner>31.57894736842104
> >> 61.02075620442082</gml:upperCorner>
> >> </gml:Envelope>
> >> </ogc:BBOX>
> >> </ogc:And>
> >> </ogc:Filter>
> >> </wfs:Query>
> >> </wfs:GetFeature>
> >>
> >> Like you can see, I added a free dataset from natural-earth to the
> >> workspace as a Shapefile-Datastore. The geometry filter describes a
> region
> >> in Europe and the isLike Filter should return all populated places where
> the
> >> name starts with hamburg (case insensitive ;o))
> >>
> >> If using the PropertyIsEqualTo Filter or the BBOX Filter as standalone
> >> request it works quite well. Only the AND Filter results into the NPE.
> Do
> >> you have any ideas? I'm a bit confused ...
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot and sorry for my delayed feedback.
> >>
> >> Frank
> >>
> >> 2010/10/1 Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> So if I understand correctly you just want to create the filter object
> >>> directly and not go through xml?
> >>> The following geotools code should do the trick:
> >>> FilterFactory ff = CommonFactoryFinder.getFilterFactory(null);
> >>> PropertyIsEqualTo filter = ff.bbox("the_geom", -75.102613
> >>> 40.212597, -72.361859 41.512517);
> >>> If you need FilterFactory2 you can safely cast to it... although
> usually
> >>> FilterFactory itself does the trick.
> >>> Hope that answers your question.
> >>> -Justin
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Frank Gasdorf
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello again Justin,
> >>>>
> >>>> Great, got it running. I also unsuccessfully tried to use
> FilterFactor2
> >>>> to create a filter like that. What I've done is: Parse the xml with
> the
> >>>> following created parser object and substitute the attribute with
> >>>> MessageFormat.
> >>>>
> >>>> org.geotools.xml.Configuration configuration = new
> >>>> org.geotools.filter.v1_1.OGCConfiguration();
> >>>> Parser parser = new org.geotools.xml.Parser(configuration);
> >>>>
> >>>> That code is quite ugly and I would like to transform it to
> >>>> FilterFactory2.
> >>>>
> >>>> Second: I also combine this "isLike" filter with a spatial filter
> (bbox,
> >>>> envelope or whatever) to add gazetteer support for the LocationView in
> udig.
> >>>> But I get a lot of NullPointerExceptions if I create bbox-Filters
> >>>> (FilterFactory2.bbox(...) or FilterFactory2.intersect(...))
> >>>>
> >>>> I had a look at the demo requests and got the following filter running
> >>>> (no NPE occured) but I have no idea how to define it with filter
> factory's:
> >>>>
> >>>> <wfs:GetFeature service="WFS" version="1.1.0"
> >>>> xmlns:topp="http://www.openplans.org/topp";
> >>>> xmlns:wfs="http://www.opengis.net/wfs";
> >>>> xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc";
> >>>> xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml";
> >>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
> >>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/wfs
> >>>> http://schemas.opengis.net/wfs/1.1.0/wfs.xsd";>
> >>>> <wfs:Query typeName="naturalEarth:ne-10m-populated-places">
> >>>> <wfs:PropertyName>topp:NAME</wfs:PropertyName>
> >>>> <ogc:Filter>
> >>>> <ogc:BBOX>
> >>>> <ogc:PropertyName>the_geom</ogc:PropertyName>
> >>>> <gml:Envelope
> >>>> srsName="http://www.opengis.net/gml/srs/epsg.xml#4326";>
> >>>> <gml:lowerCorner>-75.102613 40.212597</gml:lowerCorner>
> >>>> <gml:upperCorner>-72.361859 41.512517</gml:upperCorner>
> >>>> </gml:Envelope>
> >>>> </ogc:BBOX>
> >>>> </ogc:Filter>
> >>>> </wfs:Query>
> >>>> </wfs:GetFeature>
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you have any suggestions?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> Frank
> >>>>
> >>>> 2010/10/1 Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Frank,
> >>>>> Good to hear from you!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Well the regular expression is just a java regex, so anything that
> >>>>> works with java.util.Pattern should work as an argument to the isLike
> >>>>> function.
> >>>>> -Justin
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Frank Gasdorf
> >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Justin!
> >>>>>> Thanks a lot for the fast response and the link to the discussion! I
> >>>>>> just checked it out and it works quite well! Could you point me to
> the
> >>>>>> syntax documentation of the isLike function. I guess some chars in
> the
> >>>>>> search string are for escape, single and multi wildcard characters
> but I've
> >>>>>> no idea which one.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>> Frank
> >>>>>> 2010/9/30 Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Frank!
> >>>>>>> This has been a popular topic lately :) See this
> >>>>>>> recent discussion from the users list:
> >>>>>>>
> http://old.nabble.com/case-insensitive-LIKE-filter..-td29820164.html
> >>>>>>> -Justin
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Frank Gasdorf
> >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> found an interesting discussion right here
> >>>>>>>> http://getsatisfaction.com/opengeo/topics/cql_reference
> >>>>>>>> about default upper usage of the property Expression if using LIKE
> >>>>>>>> filters :
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> What I try to do is using WFS to implement a gazetteer like search
> >>>>>>>> for point of interests. But the user typing the search text
> doesn't know
> >>>>>>>> about the type of storage (upper or lower case or even Camel Style
> or
> >>>>>>>> whatever).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So is there a solution in geoserver 2.1.x to get results from a
> like
> >>>>>>>> query?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>> Frank
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2010/9/30 Frank Gasdorf <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hello everybody!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I enabled the WFS service for my local geoserver installation and
> >>>>>>>>> tried to request features with a LIKE Filter to find features
> with a special
> >>>>>>>>> name attribute. But I couldn't create a case insensitive filter,
> where
> >>>>>>>>> attribute values and the filter criteria is uppercase.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> FilterFactory2 filterFactory =
> >>>>>>>>> CommonFactoryFinder.getFilterFactory2( GeoTools.getDefaultHints()
> );
> >>>>>>>>> String attributeName = "nam";
> >>>>>>>>> String text = "hamburg*"
> >>>>>>>>> Expression upperAttribute =
> >>>>>>>>> filterFactory.function("strToUpperCase",
> >>>>>>>>> filterFactory.property(attributeName));
> >>>>>>>>> Filter attributeFilter = filterFactory.like(upperAttribute,
> >>>>>>>>> text.toUpperCase(), "*", "?", "\\", false);
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> the resulting filter looks like that:
> >>>>>>>>> [ strToUpperCase([nam]) is like HAMBURG* ]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> But I got no results back from the geoserver 2.0.2 WFS service.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Could you give any hints to solve this problem? Any suggestions?
> >>>>>>>>> Which filters are supported by geoserver
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Frank
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> PS: code snippet is used witth udig 1.2 on geotools 2.6.3
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
> >>>>>>>> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
> >>>>>>>> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
> >>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> >>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Justin Deoliveira
> >>>>>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> >>>>>>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Justin Deoliveira
> >>>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> >>>>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Justin Deoliveira
> >>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> >>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Justin Deoliveira
> > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> > Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
> > environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
> > easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the
> > two and get a better understanding.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geoserver-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> Senior Software Engineer
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054 Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
>
> phone: +39 0584962313
> fax: +39 0584962313
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
> http://twitter.com/geowolf
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the
two and get a better understanding.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
