I'd give this a +1 if I wasn't involved. But as I would like to expand this proposal, we'll need another vote.
What I would like to do is to have an app-schema container for all the non-core modules that hide out in the app-schema suite. We already use this pattern in extensions. For example: extensions/app-schema/app-schema-test Because app-schema is in extensions, we should not put anything there that has not been approved for release. We have (or more precisely, Rini has) one new integration test module. I'd like to put this here: community/app-schema/webservice-test And then any new app-schema related modules can start here and follow the usual process for promotion to extensions. Sound OK? Kind regards, Ben. On 08/12/10 11:14, Rini Angreani wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to create a new test module in GeoServer community module to test > gt-webservice in Geotools app-schema. The module will have tests similar to > app-schema-test in GeoServer extension, but specific for app-schema data > access with web service backend. That is, testing WFS requests like > getFeature, describeFeatureType, etc. I will call it "web-service-test". I > am not sure what the procedure is, but I'm guessing I should propose it > here, and call for votes? > > Cheers > Rini -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
