+1 from me. This is a well-considered proposal for functionality that will be much in demand. Even if support for SLD 1.1 was not optional, partial support would be a step in the right direction, so extra credit for this one. :-)
SLDs for complex features use XPaths. Does SLD 1.1 allow the GML application schema to which these relate to be specified? Or should we just put it in the schemaLocation? This would allow the information model to be more clearly associated with the SLD. (I don't know much about SLDs of any sort.) On 15/12/10 12:13, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > Chris sent out a link to the proposal the other day. Here it is again now > that it is ready for formal discussion. > > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+56+-+WMS+1.3+Support > > Feedback much appreciated. > > -Justin > > -- > Justin Deoliveira > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Enterprise support for open source geospatial. > > -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
