On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Aime <[email protected]> wrote: > The above is actually the reason why I did not try to pursue this > design in the past, > getting it right is relatively hard and it only helps on light loads, > while it makes everything > way easier to break under high load. Given GS is a server side > application, one that > is meant to serve multiple requests in parallel, I left the fully > parallelized approach > to desktop apps (where it makes a lot more sense, but still should be guarded > to > avoid chewing up all the machine resources on non toy maps).
Meh, as usual I end up sounding a lot more negative than I intend to. If we can get a speed improvements on the lighter loads I'm all for it, we just need to address it very carefully so that all the work that has been done in the past to ensure proper resource usage (and thus, stability) is not undermined by the newest changes Cheers Andrea -- Ing. Andrea Aime Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584962313 fax: +39 0584962313 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
