On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Chris Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 on all this.
>
> Perhaps two GSIP's should come out of this? One for the release model
> / schedule. And then another for automation improvements? Or perhaps
> we don't need a GSIP for that, but should get a jira and a plan of
> attack for it.
>
The proposed model is quite "release happy", so if we don't have the
automation
it's not going to be feasible.
We can have two GSIPs, first the automation one, once it's there we
can do the release schedule one?
I can help for the automation one too (within the limits of what
can be done without direct access to the build server, that is).
Cheers
Andrea
--
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
