On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeol...@opengeo.org>wrote:
>
> Good question :) Ideally we wouldn't assume any ordering for the reasons
> you state. But if the effort is so that it won't be feasible to harden the
> tests then i am not against this if it means a stable build on openjdk.
>
> Sorry if you covered this already but do we have a good idea of the
> problematic test cases?
>
>
They tend to popup semi-randomly, and normally are related to tests not
getting state changes
rolled back.
Basically what I believe most people did during the test update sprint was
to fix was we saw was broken, as
opposed to go method by method and see if there was anything to roll back.
Which means we have changes that are not rolled back, but are not harmful
in the usual Java 6 execution
order.
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
