On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:19 PM, David Winslow <[email protected]> wrote:
> The general approach sounds reasonable to me. I would quibble a bit on
> the names though - I'd prefer not to have to explain what it means to
> request an opaque layergroup with transparency enabled :)
He he
>
> How about:
> - Single: works as today, the user does not know there is structure inside
> - Group and Single: works as today, but the group structure is exposed in
> the capabilities document
> - Group Only: the group structure is exposed in the caps document, but the
> layer group
> is not given a name and thus cannot be used as a layer
> - Earth Observation Group: in this case the structure is exposed in the
> caps document, but
> we also show a new "root layer" field allowing to configure the root
> layer.
>
How about we call the second "Group" and the second "Container"?
Regardless, I believe we'll have to explain the users the difference
between them all...
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
