On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Mauro Bartolomeoli <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > I would like to start backporting the fix for > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5587 (already merged on master) to the > 2.2.x branch. > > In the meantime I created a new jira for the backport > (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5598). > > The backport should cause no issues, since GetLegendGraphic code is almost > identical in master and 2.2.x branches and the bugfix only applies on a use > case that was previously throwing an exception. > > Opinions?
It seems to me it's good to go. Backporting bug fixes normally requires no public discussion, unless the bug fix itself demands for deep changes in some core module. It's when we backport a new feature that discussion/voting is required The thing about layer groups is sort of a middle ground, layer groups are declared in the caps document as a single layer, so they have to be supported by GetLegendGraphics, otherwise the WMS can be considered buggy... at the same time, it's something that we did not have before. Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
