On 10 June 2013 12:36, Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:

>
> Any pull request?
>

I'd planned to wait until getting some feedback on the need for updating
the GWC dependency before making the pull request.

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/249

Trunk can stay against a SNAPSHOT GWC I guess, provided GWC gets deployed,
> it's the stable
> series that cannot have that.
> However... they are getting cut from the same master branch, meaning that
> if we need a bug fix
> for GWC on the stable series, we'll have to retag again from the master
> branch.
> Wondering... any chance we can make a 1.4.x stable series and leave trunk
> as the dev series?
>

Forking 1.4 off of trunk certainly makes sense to me.   It keeps coming up
that we should do it, and then it doesn't get done.  Formalizing the
schedule so GWC released in sync with GT and GS might be worthwhile.


-- 
Kevin Smith
Junior Software Developer, OpenGeo
<ksm...@opengeo.org>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to