On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>wrote:
> Sounds reasonable to me but I will let Niels chime in.
>
> Regarding the backport is there a reason not to backport it to 2.4.x?
> Thinking it is best to not diverge unless the code on master is unstable
> (which doesn't seem to be the case here) so that future backports remain
> trivial.
>
Here is the patch applied on trunk:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/commit/01843f8be22e7e30ea1acc77e3bb2de72a552f14
So, shall I backport it to 2.4.x? (no particular objection to the backport
from me, CSW just graduated
and we don't have a release with it included in the wild)
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
