On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]
> wrote:
> I certainly don't have a strong opinion but will offer it as another view.
>
> While I realize it's technically incorrect to use the term "scale" i would
> vote for sticking with it as is. Rationale being:
>
> - it is very common mis-nomenclature
> - it is the most readable while still adequately terse
>
> I think the second point is not to be overlooked since readability and
> compactness are two of the main reasons that css based styling paradigm is
> so attractive. And I think the spirit of the language was derived more from
> "what's easy" rather than "what is technically correct".
>
I could live with that... but we should at least add an explanation in the
guide, at least to
tame those that really know what a scale really is ;-)
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
