On 13/01/14 18:27, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Andrea Aime > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > -0 for upgrade for 2.5.x, unless there is compelling argument > for it. We all know how enthusiastic users are when it comes to > testing beta releases; it would be a shame to spring a largely > untested GWC on the stable branch. I think we are a bit too > close to beta. > I believe we should also check with the GWC devs about how much > changed since 1.5.0, I have the impression not much happened > Verified, not much indeed: > https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/compare/1.5.0...master > > Personally, I'd revert the version number changes, call it 1.5.1, and > use in for 2.5-beta
Hmm, yes, it looks more like a maintenance branch, with a few bug fixes and small features. I am warming to your proposal: +0 Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
