[should have included dev list] On 15/03/15 06:24, Andrea Aime wrote: > The gs-wps failures, do you have details? I'm travelling, doing a full build > uses too much battery.
Andrea, even after reverting the GeoTools type name caching, I see these failures in gs-wps-core: Failed tests: testAddOperation(org.geoserver.wps.gs.BinaryProcessingsTest): expected:<1978.0> but was:<11977.0> testMultiplyOperation(org.geoserver.wps.gs.BinaryProcessingsTest): expected:<978121.0> but was:<-9.901188E7> testStatisticsSfDem(org.geoserver.wps.gs.RasterZonalStatsTest): expected:<2.74314[4]E7> but was:<2.74314[7]E7> These failures can be fixed by reverting this commit: commit 21a6888afc6d55aeda88edd491601a88606a5e8e Author: Alvaro Huarte <[email protected]> Date: Tue Mar 3 17:24:45 2015 +0100 [GEOS-6906] Fix bad calculation of source Coverage Transform I will try reverting all three (two GeoTools and this one GeoServer) and if I can get a clean build, I will push to the master branches. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer Transient Software <http://transient.nz> New Zealand ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
