Pull requests for master, 2.7.x, and 2.6.x respectively:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/1110
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/1111
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/1112

On 19/06/15 08:28, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Sure. I checked and it is not the geoserver-release script but the
> top-level pom that causes assembly of geoserver-*-src.zip. Removing
> release/src.xml and its mention in the top level pom should prevent the
> creation of geoserver-*-src.zip files during the assembly phase. I will
> test that my understanding is correct and submit some pull requests.
> On 19/06/15 04:06, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> yes we should remove the generation of the src.zip files if you have a
>> chance!
>> On 17 June 2015 at 16:11, Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> While testing I noticed that module directory names in
>>> geoserver-2.6.4-src.zip are wildly inaccurate and do not match the pom,
>>> causing the build to fail. But we no longer use this archive, as the
>>> release pages link to GitHub source code archives, which are
>>> automagically generated on demand for any tag.
>>> Should we remove the generation of geoserver-*-src.zip from the
>>> geoserver-release script as the output is just broken cruft?

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
Director
Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/>
New Zealand

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to