Thanks Kevin/Andrea I would like to kick this out the door. Going through pull/request fixes now and trying to see what is expected to be back ported for 2.6.x. If I find anything I will kick off nightly/cite builds for final geotools revision numbers.
-- Jody Garnett On 1 September 2015 at 11:37, Kevin Smith <smit...@draconic.ca> wrote: > I thought Andrea was going to look at the whitelist backport to 2.6.x on > Monday but perhaps I misunderstood. I'll take another look at it. > > A new GWC 1.6.x release is needed as it has its own whitelist fix which is > in place and ready to go. I think we should be OK to release GT 13.5 and > GWC 1.6.3 now and then GS 2.6.5 when we get that fix backported. > > -- > Kevin Michael Smith > smit...@draconic.ca > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, at 08:51 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > > Kevin: > > Following up from last weeks meeting, I believe we are still waiting for a > "whitelist" fix to be back ported to 2.6.x. As I understand you was going > to look at this last Thursday - and did not get a chance? > > Can I start releasing geotools (not sure if we need a GWC) or is better to > wait? > -- > Jody Garnett > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *_______________________________________________* > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
