Hi Andrea, On 5 April 2016 at 07:39, Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> > So far recent releases of GDAL 1.x have worked well, but if I understand > correctly, > GDAL 2.0 has been a significant refactor. Do you know of any other project > that > has already used GDAL 2.x in anger under conditions similar to GeoServer > ones? > FWIW we've been using 2.0 in anger since well before it was released, and have had no issues, including using it in long-running processes. (But not via JNI) The 1.11->2.0 didn't actually change internal code/behaviour significantly (that was a key design goal behind the driver unification), mostly it was refactoring, some small breaking API changes, and setting up for future work on the format drivers. Rob :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
