On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> - I am hesitant to adjust the responsibilities as I believe they provide a
>> fair representation of the amount of work required to keep GeoServer
>> operational.
>>
>
> I don't understand what you mean here... are you hesitant to adjust the
> current doc, to adjust the wiki page, or ... something else?
>
I am hesitant to lower our standards, but I recognize they are not being
maintained at present. I think the responsibilities are an accurate
reflection of what it takes to keep the GeoServer project going.
- Other than recruiting additional volunteers I am not quite sure how to
>> address this
>>
>
> I'd say that people directly benefiting from working in GeoServer
> (companies, consultants) should be simply pushed to also perform chores
> that keep the projection operational and thus have more to work on in the
> future, otherwise the project risks dying. Thus the above guide.
>
This would indeed be recruiting more volunteers. Starting with companies
and consultants that benefit from GeoServer is a great place to start.
--
Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
