Jim,

I see no benefit in reverting this commit. Your and Andrew's 
contribution is appreciated. The backport was not your action. Jody was 
a blur of constructive and helpful activity, but no good deed goes 
unpunished.

Andrea, thank you for bringing this to our attention. I think this is a 
learning experience: the freeze must be observed, and exceptions must be 
discussed on the mailing list so that decision-making is transparent and 
inclusive. Are you happy for the JSON commit to remain on 2.9.x, or 
would you prefer that it be reverted? I think we accept that its 
inclusion was a deviation from procedure.

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 22/05/16 02:12, Jim Hughes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for the confusion I may have caused.  My attendance was to help
> track a particular GeoTools PR to handle unavailable factories.  The
> issue came up while testing GeoMesa with GeoTools 15-RC1.  Jody's PR
> here (1) was to help fix that.  Simone and Andrea had left some helpful
> feedback, and I wanted to know if I could do anything to help wrap up
> that work.  That PR is mentioned briefly in the meeting round-up.
>
> On Tuesday, as we continued through the PRs, Jody asked about Andrew's
> JSON work (2).  He thought it had been ready to merge for a few weeks
> pending a fix to the compilation issues.  Since Jody seemed to be ok
> with merging the PR, I addressed the build error.
>
> That discussion wasn't captured in the meeting notes, and there was no
> vote to include the PR.  Tuesday's meeting was a tough one for
> communication.
>
> I see no problem in reverting the commit on the 2.9.x series.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jim
>
> 1. https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1192
> (This blocker did get merged here:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/commit/3a8373cdd95689ec979a62606afcf6f533f32d8b?diff=unified.
> Thanks!)
>
> 2. https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/1524
>
> On 5/21/2016 9:06 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> I acted as the volunteer making the release.
>>
>> I am happy to back out the change if the mailing list considers it
>> appropriate. This release has many problems, including a long delay,
>> and I do not want to get held up over an improvement to JSON formatting.
>>
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>> On 21 May 2016 at 06:02, Andrea Aime <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Jody Garnett
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>         The first feature was discussed at the skype meeting, it has
>>         been waiting on docs for quite some time and is important to
>>         the downstream GeoMesa project. I figured if James was willing
>>         to attend our meeting to coordinate and explain its importance
>>         that I could help with the docs and see that it was included.
>>
>>
>>     Did you have PSC majority during the meeting, was there a vote?
>>     What project procedure did you call upon
>>     to justify the backport during feature freeze?
>>     Has the voice meeting become the place where "real decisions" are
>>     made, regardless of the PSC?
>>     That would also require an amendment to procedures I guess.
>>
>>     Ben was apparently at the meeting, and yet he looks surprised by
>>     the backport, was it actually discussed to start with?
>>
>>     Cheers
>>     Andrea
>>
>>     --     ==
>>     GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>>     http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
>>     ==
>>
>>     Ing. Andrea Aime
>>     @geowolf
>>     Technical Lead
>>
>>     GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>>     Via di Montramito 3/A
>>     55054 Massarosa (LU)
>>     phone: +39 0584 962313 <tel:%2B39%200584%20962313>
>>     fax: +39 0584 1660272 <tel:%2B39%200584%201660272>
>>     mob: +39  339 8844549 <tel:%2B39%20%C2%A0339%208844549>
>>
>>     http://www.geo-solutions.it
>>     http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>
>>     *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>>
>>     Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica
>>     e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente
>>     riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al
>>     destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio
>>     stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il
>>     destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via
>>     e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso,
>>     cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
>>     divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti,
>>     copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce
>>     comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>>
>>     The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended
>>     solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may
>>     be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the
>>     provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003,
>>     no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord
>>     with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying,
>>     distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
>>     strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
>>     addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please
>>     contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and
>>     delete the information in this message that has been received in
>>     error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability
>>     as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and
>>     accepts no responsibility  for changes made after they were sent
>>     or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission,
>>     viruses, etc.
>>
>>
>>     -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
>> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
>> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
>> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
>> untouched!
>> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
Director
Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/>
New Zealand

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to