So the one I know of is the *org.geotools.renderer.style.legacyAnchorPoint=true
*flag introduced for the GeoTools 17-RC1.

If we do want to preserve backwards compatibility we have some options:
- configure this flag to true during startup
- change the value based on strict=true (not sure how I feel about that)

In my experience the majority of styles do not use the default label
position, often having to manually offset it from original point
symbolizer. I kind of wish we got some feedback from 2.11-RC1 release.

--
Jody Garnett

On 17 March 2017 at 00:48, Andrea Aime <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> seeing proposals that do break backwards compatibility, I believe it's
> time to make it clearer as to why backwards
> compatibility in GeoServer is very important (and breaking it represents a
> fatal mistake most of the time).
>
> The common GeoServer deployment in public administrations is one or more
> GeoServer installations
> being accessed by a variety of internal and external clients. The range of
> clients accessing the server
> is vast and often completely out of control of the admins... because this
> is the nature of an interoperable
> service, it does not talk with a specific client, it's make to talk with
> everybody.
>
> To give a small summary:
>
>    - Internal users using one of the task specific web applications
>    - Internal users with desktop clients (often different types,
>    different departments might have different desktop clients, sometimes
>    different versions of them, especially if the desktop client in question
>    does not require a licence and the power user in question got the right to
>    install programs locally)
>    - Other internal services cascading or consuming the OGC service (SOA
>    like)
>    - External users, same as above but with a lot more variability
>
> The admins every now and then need to upgrade the server, be it because of
> security reasons, a critical bug fix, or because a new application requires
> extra functionality provided by a newer version.
> When they do so, they need to ensure that everything else keeps on
> working... and that's a lot of pain, because most of the clients above are
> _outside_ of their control, even the in house ones:
>
>    - Maybe a web application provided by a external vendor relies on some
>    extra flexibilty (e.g., not requiring the version or service), upgrading it
>    breaks it, but to fix the application a new contract with the provider
>    needs to be setup (administrative and econominal issues arise)
>    - Maybe an internal desktop client is in the same boat, but an upgrade
>    of the client might require contracts, or verification that plugin X custom
>    developed still works on the newer version, and so on.
>
> Long story short, doing upgrades requires a lot of verification, and the
> slightest backwards incompatibility just breaks havoc and makes the upgrade
> impossible (which, in case of upgrades related to security fixes, makes the
> situation untenable).
>
> That's why I keep on using a hard line on backwards incompatible changes,
> even when fixing a mistake: being "right" is not enough, operational
> continuity is more important than that.
> That does not mean we cannot change stuff, but at least a fallback option
> to re-enable the previous behavior must be always provided.
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> PS: there is also a good read here https://en.wikipedia.org/
> wiki/Robustness_principle
> To it, I'd add that on day one it's good to be as strict as possible, but
> once the deploys happen, whatever
> flexibility remained should be kept.
>
>
> --
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> phone: +39 0584 962313 <+39%200584%20962313>
> fax: +39 0584 1660272 <+39%200584%20166%200272>
> mob: +39  339 8844549 <+39%20339%20884%204549>
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
>
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to