On 13/05/17 11:13, Torben Barsballe wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz> > wrote: >> How about: >> 3. Update the failing CITE tests to reflect the existence of WFS 2.0.0. > That would certainly be the better option. However, the CITE tests their > own project / repo, and I am not especially familiar with it. > Plus, I'm not sure how easy it is to update the version of the CITE engine > we have running on ares. Has anyone done this recently?
The CITE tools are in their own repo: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver-cite-tools The tests are in a submodule that points to Justin's repo: https://github.com/jdeolive/cite-scripts/tree/9937bd36c2377f7692ab7856307f78a067de8112 History indicates that Justin has previously had to fix a few problems in the tests. Should we fork this back into a new repo in the GeoServer organisation to make it easier for us to maintain? Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz> Director Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> New Zealand ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
