> I like the idea of making geopackage core - because it is a good idea.
+1

> Brad when someone does have a chance to work on 1.2 is implemented it can
> start off life as a community module, and move into core when ready. We
> would need to support both versions right?
We would, but it probably won't be as a community module - its probably a 
variation on the geopackage implementation we already have.
My thinking is that we don't want two implementations - users shouldn't need 
to know what kind of geopackage they have, they just want to throw it against 
the geoserver wall and have it stick in the right place.

Brad



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to