Hi Andrea,

I tossed up a PR here: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2905 with a ticket https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-8779.

I am not seeing a quick way to provide a unit test.  If you (or anyone) has a suggestion on that front, I'm happy to include one.

Cheers,

Jim

On 06/08/2018 12:49 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi Jim,
yes, properly implemented collection wrappers should allow delegation

Cheers
Andrea

On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Jim Hughes <jhug...@ccri.com <mailto:jhug...@ccri.com>> wrote:

    Andrea,

    Thanks for helping the PR through.

    I haven't tested out the first case completely.  I've definitely
    run into the issue that Alvaro is trying to address with WFS 2.0.

    In the short term, is allowing the FC to delegate reasonable?

    Cheers,

    Jim


    On 06/08/2018 12:07 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
    Ah,
    that change was controversial and the pull request sat there for
    ages before being merged:
    https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2664
    <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2664>

    (shows me as the author, but it's not really me, I'm just
    unwillingly involved because nobody else would take action)

    Please discuss.

    Cheers
    Andrea


    On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Jim Hughes <jhug...@ccri.com
    <mailto:jhug...@ccri.com>> wrote:

        Hi all,

        While testing out GeoMesa with GeoServer 2.13.x, we ran into
        some issues with the FeatureSizeFeatureCollection.  I think
        there are two issues:

        First, for a layers backed by a large volume of data,
        getCount returning -1 is partially a way of saying that you
        don't want to count all the features;).  Given this pattern,
        I'd suggest that the FeatureSizeFeatureCollection might be
        taken off the usual path completely.  It looks like it might
        be an optimization when working with a bunch of little
        shapefiles.

        Second, WPSes can be implemented with a visitor pattern.  For
        instance, the gs:Unique process leverages the GeoTools
        UniqueVisitor(1) which is recognized by the JDBC DataStores. 
        (In GeoMesa, we do a bunch of similar things.)

        The fact that the current FeatureSizeFeatureCollection
        doesn't delegate prevents the UniqueProcess (and the GeoMesa
        ones) from working properly...

        In the short term, any objection to a PR which enables
        delegation for that FeatureCollection?

        Cheers,

        Jim

        1. UniqueVisitor:
        
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/main/src/main/java/org/geotools/feature/visitor/UniqueVisitor.java
        
<https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/main/src/main/java/org/geotools/feature/visitor/UniqueVisitor.java>

        
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/jdbc/src/main/java/org/geotools/jdbc/SQLDialect.java#L375
        
<https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/jdbc/src/main/java/org/geotools/jdbc/SQLDialect.java#L375>


        p.s.  I debugged this using PostGIS and the gs:Unique
        process. When the FeatureSizeFC was 'on', the queries did not
        have the 'distinct' keyword.  When the FC was off, GeoServer
        did make a 'distinct' query.


        
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
        engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
        _______________________________________________
        Geoserver-devel mailing list
        Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
        <mailto:Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
        <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel>




--
    Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the
    experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing.
    Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di
    Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax:
    +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it
    http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
    <http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it>
    ------------------------------------------------------- /Con
    riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali
    (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei
    dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla
    presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è
    un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i
    indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore,
    è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le
    sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is
    intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
    otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided
    by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination
    or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other
    than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received
    this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone
    or e-mail./





--

Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it ------------------------------------------------------- /Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail./


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to