3am or 4:30am or 6am isn’t really going to make any difference to me. I’d prefer something that worked really well for the majority than something that is a poor compromise for everyone.
I will occasionally make it (depending on travel and work commitments), so just do what works well for the other PSC members. From: Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, 15 November 2018 7:01 AM To: Brad Hards <br...@frogmouth.net> Cc: GeoServer <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] propose change to meet schedule good point brad, happy to withdraw the proposal. -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 13:01, <br...@frogmouth.net <mailto:br...@frogmouth.net> > wrote: I’m not going to make it (3am). That shouldn’t be a determinant on whether it works better for the majority though. From: Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com <mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 6:48 AM To: GeoServer <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: [Geoserver-devel] propose change to meet schedule With our geographic dispersal rating taking a hit we discussed changing the meeting schedule in todays GeoServer / GeoTools meeting. proposing: - bi-weekly meeting - 16:00 UTC - half an hour meeting The thinking being that we are meeting more often so the meeting can be shortened. 16:00 UTC does not need to adjust for daylight savings time. The bi-weekly meeting is a good pace to discuss items in person as they came up. -- Jody Garnett
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
