Thanks, we will try and review in this morning's meeting. -- Jody Garnett
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 05:15, Peter Rushforth <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jody, > > Yes, what Chris merged and this request go together, although because > they're separate projects I needed to submit separate pull requests. Chris > doesn't have committer rights on GeoWebCache, so we still need someone to > look at and merge this request: > https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/pull/781 > > Cheers, > Peter > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 7:15 PM Jody Garnett <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Looks like Chris was able to merge this >> <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3670> for you, excellent. >> -- >> Jody Garnett >> >> >> On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 18:54, Peter Rushforth <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> OK, I just submitted a pull request for this addition, because I built >>> GeoServer without the MapML module and the text/mapml format does not show >>> up in the capabilities. It's apparent that it was designed to get the info >>> formats from the WMS and check if they exist in the GeoWebCache MimeType >>> definition. Given that with the MapML module installed, the WMS will have >>> the text/mapml format defined, that format shows up appropriately in the >>> GWC WMTS capabilities document. >>> >>> Seems like it will work. >>> >>> Let me know if there's something that needs attention! >>> Thank you >>> Peter >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 1:24 PM Peter Rushforth < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am looking at integrating GWC support into the MapML Community >>>> Module. The idea would be that if you install the module, you would be >>>> able to use GWC cached/cacheable layers as MapML content i.e. the tile URLs >>>> would be referenced by their row/column cache values. >>>> >>>> It currently works pretty well. I am trying to integrate MapML as a >>>> FeatureInfo optional format, and this is what my question is about. >>>> >>>> Currently GWC has a set list of info formats coded, which can't be >>>> added to or removed from without changing java code, like this: >>>> https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/compare/master...Maps4HTML:master >>>> >>>> I was wondering what an appropriate way to deal with this is. I don't >>>> know if its right to want to query the WMS for all the info formats >>>> available and include them, that might generate too many featureinfo >>>> elements. On the other hand, it's not right to hard code text/mapml as a >>>> gwc info format, because that means the MapML Community Module must be >>>> installed for that not to cause errors on the geoserver side. >>>> >>>> Would a spring bean configuration approach be appropriate? What would >>>> you like to see in that? >>>> >>>> Thanks for your thoughts. If there's some agreement, I would write up >>>> a GSIP or GWCIP if appropriate. >>>> >>>> I could just ignore the issue and use the GetFeatureInfo against a WMS >>>> request for the bounds of the tile in question, not a WMTS GetFeatureInfo >>>> request, but then text/mapml format doesn't show up in the WMTS >>>> capabilities, which would be nice for those who install the module. >>>> >>>> Cheers, and thanks, >>>> Peter >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Geoserver-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
