Here's a compiled list of all branches whose future is yet to be decided:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Wg0gqbiXdwyb4lt_52UK4C9qnN6yj20vWRlbzlgpJgY/edit?usp=sharing

I didn't have time yet to dig deeper into each one to recommend and action
though.

I've a backup of all the branches before starting this so no worries.



On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 11:05, Gabriel Roldan <gabriel.rol...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Nuno for the command.
>
> I'm gonna start by deleting the following ones that are safe to remove:
>
> Already merged to (reachable from) master:
> git for-each-ref --sort=committerdate
> --format="%(committerdate:short),%(objectname:short),%(refname:short),\"%(authorname)\""
> refs/remotes/upstream --merged=master
> Date Commit Name Author Action
> 2014-01-15 633fa54f0d upstream/master-recover Andrea Aime delete
> 2018-10-26 6708a2449d upstream/jdk11_restructure Jody Garnett delete
> 2018-11-17 5de88f9940 upstream/sld10-hint Andrea Aime delete
> 2019-10-15 9235bc9505 upstream/revert-3826-disable_concurrent_get_tests Andrea
> Aime delete
> 2019-11-16 9ffa145bcc upstream/revert-3860-perf/filesystemwatcher Andrea
> Aime delete
>
> Already merged to (reachable from) 2.16.x (covers all reachable from
> 2.15.x too):
> git for-each-ref --sort=committerdate
> --format="%(committerdate:short),%(objectname:short),%(refname:short),\"%(authorname)\""
> refs/remotes/upstream --merged=2.16.x
> Date Commit Name Author Action
> 2019-08-16 a1ec1ddc1d upstream/backport-3712-to-2.16.x AndyFlem delete
> 2019-08-28 0f564cd352 upstream/backport-3722-to-2.16.x Fernando Mino
> delete
> 2019-09-27 a36cf2458a upstream/backport-3792-to-2.16.x Imran delete
> 2019-10-04 ac3644b8f8 upstream/backport-3808-to-2.16.x Dmitri Sirobokov
> delete
> 2019-10-11 b0c91c09a0 upstream/backport-3820-to-2.16.x unknown delete
> 2019-10-18 21a369026f upstream/backport-3837-to-2.16.x njankovic delete
> 2019-10-19 d3034f0d78 upstream/backport-3797-to-2.16.x Andrea Aime delete
> 2019-10-20 7710e2069c upstream/backport-3844-to-2.16.x Andrea Aime delete
> 2019-11-16 534d66b67a upstream/revert-3896-backport-3860-to-2.16.x Andrea
> Aime delete
>
> Already merged to (reachable from) 2.1.x to 2.14.x
> for i in `seq 1 14`; do git for-each-ref --sort=committerdate
> --format="%(committerdate:short),%(objectname:short),%(refname:short),\"%(authorname)\""
> refs/remotes/upstream --merged=upstream/2.$i.x >>
> branches/merged_to_2.1.x_to_2.14.x.csv ;done
> Date Commit Name Author Action
> 2013-06-24 dc09fb111a upstream/22x-recover Andrea Aime delete
> 2014-01-13 f74b11f5e4 upstream/24x-recover Andrea Aime delete
> 2014-01-13 fbc784acad upstream/23x-recover Tom Kunicki delete
> 2014-01-15 633fa54f0d upstream/master-recover Andrea Aime delete
> 2015-07-22 b385fb4fbd upstream/simboss-patch-3 Simone Giannecchini delete
> 2015-08-28 c109f82313 upstream/simboss-patch-4 Simone Giannecchini delete
> 2015-09-23 9a5f724671 upstream/27_GEOS-7207 afabiani delete
> 2015-09-23 b27e40eee3 upstream/28_GEOS-7207 afabiani delete
> 2016-02-06 1e9a417f20
> upstream/removing-params-extract-from-2.8.x-community Simone Giannecchini
> delete
> 2016-02-06 51e7d8caf9 upstream/removing-params-extractor-from-2.7-nightly 
> Simone
> Giannecchini delete
> 2016-02-06 fdcfc58233 upstream/fix-nightly-2.7.x Simone Giannecchini
> delete
> 2019-07-15 0d218d671d upstream/backport-3660-to-2.14.x Imran delete
> 2019-08-28 ab0ed73996 upstream/backport-3722-to-2.14.x Fernando Mino
> delete
>
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 22:25, Torben Barsballe <torbenbarsba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I haven't had experience with automatic branch deletion either, but seems
>> like a good idea to me. +1.
>>
>> It looks like a good chunk of the extra branches seem to be from various
>> large collaborative efforts (e.g. java 11 refactor, ysld). Given that a
>> bunch of those involved some degree of refactoring before being merged,
>> it's likely they won't show up as dangling branches
>>
>> Most of the rest seem to be old PR branches from before "PR's should be
>> on forks" was included in the contributing guide or enforced.
>>
>> All that said, I've deleted my four dangling branches - thanks for that
>> search command Nuno.
>>
>> Wed May 10 12:03:02 2017 -0700  Torben Barsballe
>> refs/remotes/upstream/GEOS-8117-cite
>>
>> Thu Oct 25 16:16:27 2018 -0700  Torben Barsballe
>> refs/remotes/upstream/jdk11
>>
>> Mon Oct 29 09:30:58 2018 -0700  Torben Barsballe
>> refs/remotes/upstream/jdk11_main_split
>>
>> Thu Oct 25 12:36:04 2018 -0700  Torben Barsballe
>> refs/remotes/upstream/spring-5.1
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Torben
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 3:31 AM Nuno Oliveira GeoSolutions <
>> nuno.olive...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gabriel, Andrea,
>>> no experience with that automation, but I would say +1.
>>>
>>> Just cleaned my dangling branch:
>>>
>>> >$ git for-each-ref --sort=authorname --format="%(committerdate) %09
>>> %(authorname) %09 %(refname)" refs/remotes/upstream | grep "Nuno Oliveira"
>>>   Thu Oct 3 22:57:07 2019 +0200    Nuno Oliveira
>>> refs/remotes/upstream/revert-3778-GEOS-9340
>>>
>>> >$ git push upstream --delete revert-3778-GEOS-9340
>>>   To https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver
>>>    - [deleted]         revert-3778-GEOS-9340
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Nuno Oliveira
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 6:51 PM Andrea Aime <
>>> andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 7:48 PM Andrea Aime <
>>>> andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We should start by making sure once a PR is merged, it's branch gets
>>>>>> deleted. Especially the ones created by the backports hook, cause almost
>>>>>> all other ones should come from branches on people's forks so each one 
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> do whatever they want with those.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Just stumbled into this automation, has anyone experiences with it?
>>>>
>>>> https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/managing-the-automatic-deletion-of-branches
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Andrea
>>>>
>>>> ==
>>>>
>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>>>> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime
>>>> @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054
>>>> Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339
>>>> 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- *Con
>>>> riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
>>>> 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
>>>> precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
>>>> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
>>>> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
>>>> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
>>>> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.
>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
>>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
>>>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
>>>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
>>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
>>>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.*
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Nuno Oliveira
>>> ==
>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>>> Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
>>> ==
>>>
>>> Nuno Miguel Carvalho Oliveira
>>> @nmcoliveira
>>> Software Engineer
>>>
>>> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>>> Via di Montramito 3/A
>>> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
>>> Italy
>>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>>> fax:      +39 0584 1660272
>>>
>>> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati
>>> personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla
>>> protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni
>>> circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto,
>>> gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza
>>> è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo
>>> scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è
>>> tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita.
>>> Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.
>>>
>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to
>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that
>>> is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
>>> disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European
>>> Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or
>>> use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone
>>> other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
>>> have received this email by mistake, please notify
>>> us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>
>
>
> --
> Gabriel Roldán
>


-- 
Gabriel Roldán
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to