Hi Andrea,

I'm not willing using Spring boot : it's only the one I used in my own
project when I detected the bug and attempted a fix. Now that the fix is
done, I would like to port the test from Spring-boot to the Spring of
Geoserver, following the project rules, and it's what I'm writing. This,
and nothing else.

Second, I read the whole thread too, and it took time to convince you that
the feature of automatic generation from rest services is needed and used
in businesses and that it requires correct descriptions for that. Like wsdl
of Soap services have to conform to the web-services they are presenting.

When I was first searching for the cause of the issue, I went on
Stackoverflow and on XStream project, both showed me that explanations
wasn't easy to find, as Geoserver has plenty of specific way to handle REST
services, and these, I can only learn them for you, as I'm actually
attempting to correct the problem. For all of us.
In it's build phase,  Geoserver project doesn't seem to use the content of
yaml or openapi.json files, and it doesn't seem to produce them too. (Or, I
would to know where: it's the goal of my last message).
This make me believe that these files are written manually, as a
documentation source, but they might all be unsynchronized. And I would
like to find a way to correct this.

The work (if I am lucky) isn't so hard :
1. Put OpenAPI annotations on REST server classes.
2. Copy human written documentation from yaml in these annotation
3. Ask Geoserver to publish that content from it's "target" directory
classes, and not from a static file in main/resources.
Then thinks will ok for sure.

But starting here, I don't know enough Geoserver internals to find each
thing I would like to find. And understand how everything is working. This
is why I'm asking. But I'm asking only to correct the problem globally and
the more widely it is possible. If others parts of Geoserver dggs, wfs3
suffer the same problem that yaml files, no worry if we find the accurate
way of correcting them easily.

In 2017, when the documentation was written in yaml, I'm sure that it was
accurate. Surely, input and output descriptions were ok with the REST
services. And because Swagger didn't offer generation plugin/tools to
create clients, it was difficult to check if what was in yaml files were
strictly what the server was serving. In 2019, Swagger tool was here, but
how writers of yaml documentation of 2017 would have been notified ? They
were on other tasks then.
But now that the tool exist, that the problem is detected and that
desynchronization make yaml files less useful, it's time to correct them.
I'm on it since 20 or 30 hours. I'm not searching to talk against Geoserver
: I'm just trying to see the whole extend of the issue to find a way to
correct it everywhere. Because if I take each yaml file one by one and
correct them like I did for workspaces.yaml, you understand that this work
will take months.

Regards,

Marc Le Bihan


Le lun. 15 févr. 2021 à 09:31, Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> a
écrit :

> Hi Marc,
> checking this whole thread again, you will probably have an easier time
> rewriting the relevant part
> of GeoServer from scratch using Spring boot, rather than successfully
> contributing a single line of code to GeoServer.
> The helpful bits on how to expose swagger UI has been completely ignored,
> and turned back to become another example
> on how the current GeoServer setup is broken. I have no desire to continue
> this conversation any further, maybe some
> other core developer will be more motivated.
>
> Andrea
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:38 AM Marc Le Bihan <mlebiha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Andrea,
>>
>> Integration test running and Spring compatibilty My best target for
>> integration testing is Geoserver project. But currently I don't know of to
>> set a test, that :
>>     1. Launch a Geoserver instance, like *org.geoserver.web.Start*
>>     2. Then, this one started, starts the Integration test
>> ConfigurationIT on it.
>>
>>     It's something that comes immediately in my test class that is ran by
>> *failsafe* plugin (and not *surefire*) at the *integration-test* phase
>> of *Maven* build cycle :
>>
>>         @SpringBootTest(classes = TestApplication.class)
>>         public class ConfigurateurIT {
>>
>>             where TestApplication is a simple declaration of a main
>> class, with a component scan :
>>                 @SpringBootApplication
>>                 @ComponentScan(basePackages={"fr", "test", "com"})
>>                 public class TestApplication {
>>                 }
>>
>>     I don't know how to reproduce the same behavior in Geoserver, using
>> Spring and following the Geoserver practices.
>>     Else, it would cause the troubles you wrote for long term
>> maintenance. I just don't know how to perform the same test in "geoserver
>> way" at the moment.
>>
>>     Spring / Spring boot usage     for Spring / Spring boot usage and
>> OpenApi generation, you're right, it's the underlying dependency you see in
>> projects :
>>         <dependency>
>>             <groupId>io.swagger.core.v3</groupId>
>>             <artifactId>swagger-core</artifactId>
>>             <version>2.0.2</version>
>>         </dependency>
>>
>>      that is doing the job of publishing *swagger-ui.html* pages, and
>> *springdoc-openapi-ui* is just an additional hat over it, I guess to
>> offer services like setting this page on another URL with a property, such
>> as :
>>            springdoc.api-docs.path=/geoserver/rest/v3/api-docs
>>
>>     openapi.json generation
>>     I wasn't able to set the correct url to go to
>> http://localhost:8080/geoserver/ogc/dggs/api?f=text%2Fhtml on my own
>> geoserver (I had a 404 error code),
>>
>>     but I've took a look of what is inside : this part is generating a
>> *swagger-ui.html* from a static *openapi.json* (from 2021, January 26th)
>> coming with the last push someone did on *git*.
>>
>>     It does not generate openapi.json from the existing REST server
>> classes, and does not generate interfaces that server classes would
>> implement instead form that *openapi.json*, neither ( we should find
>> swagger classes generated for each model class in a target/swagger
>> directory at compile time).
>>         When I search for the string "*Access the list of zones in a
>> given DGGS*", that is readable among the documentation on
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/master/src/community/ogcapi/ogcapi-core/src/main/resources/swagger-ui,
>> in Geoserver sources,
>>         I can't find it in any other place than openapi.json : if
>> openapi.json was used for generation or implementation, this string should
>> be found in one annotation on a REST server class, or in generated classes
>> in target/swagger sources.
>>         Here, I see only openapi.json in java/*main*/resources
>>
>>     I don't understand where openapi.json files are coming from, who is
>> maintaining it and comiting them.
>>     It looks to be like a manually generated file again, having the same
>> trouble than *workspaces.yaml* and other yaml files : unable to prove
>> that it depicts the real REST methods and classes used.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Marc Le Bihan
>>
>> On 13/02/2021 14:00, Andrea Aime wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 9:28 AM Marc Le Bihan <mlebiha...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> About workspaces.yaml : I added the corrected yaml file and a test for
>>> [GEOS-9886] workspaces.yaml doesn't carry correct descriptions of REST
>>> services it presents. (as an effect, a working Swagger client cannot be
>>> generated for it) <https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-9886>
>>>
>>> Before creating a pull request to send the corrected
>>> *geoserver/doc/en/api/1.0.0/workspaces.yaml*,
>>> I would like to find a way to put the test I did in geoserver. But it
>>> could a long work, because I don't know how to reproduce all the steps of
>>> my own test project in a manner compatible to geoserver project rules.
>>> And I would like to check the next point to see if it can offer a better
>>> solution too.
>>>
>>
>> I see you are mentioning a Spring Boot test in the ticket, however,
>> GeoServer does not use nor depends on Spring boot.
>> But maybe it could be a separate maven module that only runs tests? That
>> one could be using whatever you like.
>> On the other end, using only technologies/libraries already in use in the
>> project would help in maintenance, modules
>> that long term maintainers are not familiar with, risk of being kicked to
>> the side and eventually removed.
>> Then again, it just takes a single developer to maintain a module, if
>> you're going to be the one, then the above is not a problem.
>>
>>
>>> About openapi.json generation from existing REST services When adding
>>> this dependency to an application (I've used it's version 1.5.3, compatible
>>> with Spring-boot 2.4.1)
>>>
>>>     <dependency>
>>>         <groupId>org.springdoc</groupId>
>>>         <artifactId>springdoc-openapi-ui</artifactId>
>>>     </dependency>
>>>
>>> Swagger/OpenAPI immediately makes available
>>>
>>>    http://localhost:8080/swagger-ui.html
>>>           that produces the same web interface than the one on Geoserver
>>> documentation website.
>>>
>>>    http://localhost:8080/v3/api-docs
>>>         that describes the REST services in a json format (instead of a
>>> yaml one, but I don't know if it matters).
>>>
>>> This path can be changed with this property :
>>>     springdoc.api-docs.path=/geoserver/rest/v3/api-docs
>>>
>>
>> Would it work without having Spring-boot in the classpath?
>> I'll also note the ogc-api modules are already publishing an API endpoint
>> that renders with Swagger, without
>> that particular maven dependency, e.g.:
>> https://tb16.geo-solutions.it/geoserver/ogc/dggs/api?f=text%2Fhtml
>>
>> The setup for the OGC APIs is different, because the yamls have to be
>> adapted on the fly based on the collections
>> in the server, which involves reading a yaml starting template, adapting
>> it with Java code, and re-encoding
>> it back in json/yaml/html.
>> The swagger-ui is referenced directly from the classpath:
>>
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/master/src/community/ogcapi/ogcapi-core/src/main/resources/swagger-ui
>>
>> and published using a ClasspathPublisher:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/community/ogcapi/ogcapi-core/src/main/resources/applicationContext.xml#L24
>>
>> If all you need is static files, then a single classpath publisher will
>> do the trick, without requiring any new dependency.
>> Just a matter of placing the files in  src/main/resources and add a
>> declaration in the application context.
>>
>> What worries me however is that we're talking just about the workspace
>> yaml file.
>> Is that the only file you're going to add?
>> Having a directly reachable API declaration will just reinforce the idea
>> that the API declarations are machine processable,
>> so it would be best if it did not contain anything that's not working for
>> generating clients, no?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>> == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf
>> Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa
>> (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549
>> http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>> ------------------------------------------------------- *Con riferimento
>> alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 -
>> Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni
>> circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali
>> allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i
>> destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per
>> errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le
>> sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended
>> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
>> information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
>> disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679
>> “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information
>> herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
>> have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by
>> telephone or e-mail.*
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Regards, Andrea Aime
>
> == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf
> Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa
> (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549
> http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
> ------------------------------------------------------- *Con riferimento
> alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 -
> Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni
> circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali
> allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i
> destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per
> errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le
> sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended
> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
> disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679
> “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information
> herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
> have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or e-mail.*
>
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to