Hi, My late +1
By the comparison http://www.java-logging.com/comparison/ I would have liked to see also a proposal for logback that by the feature table seems to be on the same line with log4j, but we do not have such proposal. -Jukka Rahkonen- Lähettäjä: Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> Lähetetty: maanantai 14. helmikuuta 2022 16.28 Vastaanottaja: GeoServer <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Aihe: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-167 Log4j Update GSIP-167 did not pass. So this proposal was not approved before the attached quite expired on Feb 11th. Please advise what you would like to do next. Jody On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 5:36 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com<mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com>> wrote: Financial proposal provided and attached to https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-167 -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 10:12, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com<mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com>> wrote: Based on today's meeting: I would like to propose GSIP-167 I will attach a quote for 5k to the above page; suggest remaining funds go to cite code sprint. -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 13:42, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com<mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com>> wrote: I double checked what was needed for log4j update, and updated the proposal to reflect log4 2 ability to load log4 1 configuration files: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-167 While I am not sure I have capacity I hope the research is useful. -- Jody Garnett -- -- Jody Garnett
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
