Okay, Ian unintentionally ran an experiment by re-tagging  2.21.0 to
include an additional fix: 135494dccc2c50ba4d0ddcb110a55339081163a1

This gave me the same error since I had the previous 2.21.0 tag locally.
--
Jody Garnett


On May 23, 2022 at 10:16:28 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I honestly do not know how I got that, my theory is:
>
> - geocat/geoserver syncs with geoserver/geoserver (perhaps including tags)
> - when we re-run builds a revision may be re-tagged by the release process
> - some time in the future if I am unlucky I get a tag conflict
>
> So yeah i suspect this is just me.
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 2:08 AM Andrea Aime <
> andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jody,
>> how are you getting that?
>>
>> I've tried with a "git fetch -t", getting no errors:
>>
>> > git fetch -t
>> remote: Enumerating objects: 2264, done.
>> remote: Counting objects: 100% (1560/1560), done.
>> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (478/478), done.
>> remote: Total 2264 (delta 1070), reused 1504 (delta 1030), pack-reused 704
>> Ricezione degli oggetti: 100% (2264/2264), 688.85 KiB | 1.94 MiB/s, fatto.
>> Risoluzione dei delta: 100% (1074/1074), completato con 86 oggetti locali.
>> Da github.com:geoserver/geoserver
>>    3e7e8c2bcd..0f33e1f6b9  main
>>                                   -> geoserver/main
>>    b101163df4..58a6db824b  2.19.x
>>                                   -> geoserver/2.19.x
>>    42cfdb1d74..0afcf2a7d3  2.20.x
>>                                   -> geoserver/2.20.x
>>    e48d0f9cdc..6dcc807326  2.21.x
>>                                   -> geoserver/2.21.x
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5873/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5873
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5874/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5874
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5875/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5875
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5876/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5876
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5877/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5877
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5878/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5878
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5879/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5879
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5880/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5880
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5881/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5881
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5882/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5882
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5883/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5883
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5884/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5884
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5885/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5885
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5886/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5886
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5887/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5887
>>  * [nuovo riferimento]     refs/pull/5888/head
>>                                    -> geoserver/pr/5888
>>  ! [rifiutato]             2.20.2
>>                                   -> 2.20.2  (sovrascriverebbe il tag
>> esistente)
>>  * [nuovo tag]             2.21-M0.1
>>                                    -> 2.21-M0.1
>>  * [nuovo tag]             2.21-RC
>>                                    -> 2.21-RC
>>  * [nuovo tag]             2.21.0
>>                                   -> 2.21.0
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 10:25 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have run into some conflicts trying to sync tags between remote repos:
>>>
>>>  = [up to date]            2.16.2                  -> 2.16.2
>>>
>>>  ! [rejected]              2.16.3                  -> 2.16.3  (would
>>> clobber existing tag)
>>>
>>>  = [up to date]            2.16.4                  -> 2.16.4
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>  = [up to date]            2.20.2                  -> 2.20.2
>>>
>>>  ! [rejected]              2.20.4                  -> 2.20.4  (would
>>> clobber existing tag)
>>>
>>>  = [up to date]            2.3-RC1                 -> 2.3-RC1
>>>
>>> I do not know if this is just me?  Not sure how they got out of sync?
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Andrea Aime
>>
>> ==
>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>>
>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.
>> ==
>>
>> Ing. Andrea Aime
>> @geowolf
>> Technical Lead
>>
>> GeoSolutions Group
>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>>
>> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>>
>> mob:   +39  333 8128928
>>
>> https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/
>>
>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg.
>> UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
>> precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
>> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
>> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
>> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
>> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.
>>
>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail
>>
> --
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to