> > >> The proposal identifies a number of areas that will be included in scope; >> one I was interested in was not covered. The ability to limit the srs >> published by WMS is a common configuration - although not in scope I assume >> it could be covered by allowing: IAU2000:49900,IAU2000:49901 >> > > It's not in scope, but I will try to sneak it in, if I manage to work > below the allocated timebox. No promises though. >
Clarification: I am not trying to put it in scope; just understand if we have a decent plan in mind if capacity shows up in the future :) > > >> I honestly do not know how it works for the top-level srs list if there >> are a mix of earth layers and planetary layers in a WMS - perhaps it should >> be empty? >> > > Not really... we already have plenty of incompatible combinations by > mixing local and global SRSs, that will fail if tried. Testing what's > compatible > would make the time for generating the caps balloon, but also, the area of > definition of SRSs is going to be missing from WKT based systems, > and when available is useful only from a bureaucratic point of view, it's > often way too tight for cross-border projects. > Cool; as above - just trying to understand how it fits together. It could be that these layers would be best handled as a virtual web service (if we really need accurately restricted capabilities). Cheers, Jody
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
