Andrea:

I am in favour of being less *specific* in these kind of requirements in
preference to stating the goal and providing an example.

"The module is not site specific and can be configured for use by the
general GeoServer community. A community module that already has 3 users
would meet this goal; while a community module that has hard coded a domain
name would not."

(And I will stay on topic)
--
Jody Garnett


On Mar 12, 2024 at 4:19:42 AM, Andrea Aime <
andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm starting this conversation to see if/how we can amend the procedures
> for graduating a community module a bit.
>
> For reference, the current procedure is here:
>
> https://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/community-modules.html#id2
>
> In particular, I'm thinking about requirement "1", the module has at least
> 3 users.
> The reason for the check is a good one, we don't want to clutter the main
> code base with modules that are specific to one single user site. At the
> same time, this creates a "chicken and egg" problem, because many sites
> won't consider using a module until it's supported.
>
> So, I'd like to keep the intent of requirement 1, but propose a change in
> its implementation. 3 usage sites can be one of the options, but can we
> also consider a PSC opinion on the matter as a valid alternative? And a PSC
> member can provide feedback on the module generality while the graduation
> is being voted.
>
> I know that Jody wants to also talk about point 3 (module being stable, as
> a prerequisite, the standards that the module is based on being stable
> too), but can we please have a separate thread for that?
>
> Best regards
> Andrea
>
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>
> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions Group
> phone: +39 0584 962313
>
> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>
> mob:   +39  339 8844549
>
> https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/
>
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
> 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
> precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.
>
> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to