Hi Jody, please let's not start mixing approaches... we can have everything in discourse, or everything in google discussions, or everything in the github "discussions"... as long as we stick with one.
Using different solutions for the same problem (threaded and asynch communication) is confusing. Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions Group phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/ http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it ------------------------------------------------------- Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 8:57 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay I am about to package up geoserver-devel mbox for search archive on > discourse GeoServer / devel ... this restores the search ability we lost > when nabble went away. > > And wanted to ask what to do next: > > > 1. We can use the GeoServer / devel forum just fine as a mailing list > 2. We can enable google discussions on our github repository. > I see other pygeoapi > <https://github.com/geopython/pygeoapi/discussions> doing okay with > this approach; and it is the one the core-geonetwork team favours as they > make their own transition from sourceforge. > > > In sort I am ready to write a proposal for geoserver-devel as a follow up > to GISP-225 <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-225> - what > would *you* like me to write up? > - - > Jody Garnett > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
